Protecting Seniors' Data Act of 2025

Senate Bill

S. 1943

119th Congress

Protecting Seniors' Data Act of 2025

In Committee

Introduced:Jun 4, 2025

Primary Sponsor

Marco Rubio

R - FL

Cosponsors

8

Quick Stats

Policy Area

Government Operations and Politics

Summary

This bill establishes a preference for traditional and classical architectural styles in the design of new federal government buildings, especially in Washington, D.C. It creates a council to advise the General Services Administration on building designs, and requires the agency to notify Congress if it approves a design that doesn't match the preferred styles.

Latest Action

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Introduced6/4/2025

StatusRead twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

ChamberSenate

Data from Congress.gov

See this page through your district lens

Enter ZIP to personalize representatives and vote context.

Stay on top of this issue

Subscribe for weekly bill and representative updates.

Vote Prediction

Protecting Seniors' Data Act of 2025

This bill establishes a preference for traditional and classical architectural styles in the design of new federal government buildings, especially in Washington, D.C. It creates a council to advise the General Services Administration on building designs, and

Community Breakdown

Pass

0%

Fail

0%

0 predictions

This bill establishes a preference for traditional and classical architectural styles in the design of new federal government buildings, especially in Washington, D.C. It creates a council to advise the General Services Administration on building designs, and requires the agency to notify Congress if it approves a design that doesn't match the preferred styles.

Bill Number: 1943
Introduced: 6/4/2025
Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Policy Area: Government Operations and Politics

Data from Congress.gov

AI-generated summary

Fact Sheet

Title: Protecting Seniors' Data Act of 2025
Bill Number: 1943
Sponsor: No sponsor
Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Introduced: 6/4/2025
Summary: This bill establishes a preference for traditional and classical architectural styles in the design of new federal government buildings, especially in Washington, D.C. It creates a council to advise the General Services Administration on building designs, and requires the agency to notify Congress i

Data from Congress.gov

AI Summary

Plain-English explanation of this bill

This bill establishes a preference for traditional and classical architectural styles in the design of new federal government buildings, especially in Washington, D.C. It creates a council to advise the General Services Administration on building designs, and requires the agency to notify Congress if it approves a design that doesn't match the preferred styles.

Last updated: 12/30/2025

Official Summary

Congressional Research Service summary

Beautifying Federal Civic Architecture Act of 2023 This bill establishes policy on the preferred architecture of federal public buildings. For example, the bill establishes that (1) traditional and classical architecture is the preferred style for federal public buildings, and (2) classical architecture is the default and preferred style for federal public buildings in the District of Columbia. The bill also establishes a Council on Improving Federal Civic Architecture to evaluate and advise the General Services Administration (GSA) on the design of new and existing federal public buildings. If GSA approves a design that diverges from preferred architecture, it must notify Congress and the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy.

Key Points

Main provisions of the bill

The bill establishes traditional and classical architecture as the preferred style for new federal public buildings
It sets classical architecture as the default and preferred style for federal buildings in Washington, D.C.
The bill creates a council to evaluate and advise the General Services Administration on building designs
The GSA must notify Congress if it approves a design that diverges from the preferred architectural styles

How This Impacts Americans

Potential effects on citizens and communities

This bill would primarily impact the design and construction of new federal government buildings, especially those located in the nation's capital. It could lead to more traditional or classical-looking federal facilities across the country, rather than modern or experimental architectural styles. The architectural preferences established in the bill would affect the work of government agencies, contractors, and designers involved in federal building projects.

Policy Areas

Primary Policy Area

Government Operations and Politics

Scope & Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction Level

federal

Congressional Session

119th Congress

Citation Reference

1943, 119th Congress (2025). "Protecting Seniors' Data Act of 2025". Source: Voter's Right Platform. https://votersright.org/bills/118-s-1943

Public Opinions

Community submissions related to this bill.

Share your opinion

No public opinions yet. Be the first to submit one for this bill.

Related Bills in Government Operations and Politics

HRES 333

Recognizing the enduring cultural and historical significance of emancipation in the Nation's capital on the anniversary of President Abraham Lincoln's signing of the District of Columbia Compensated Emancipation Act, which established the "first freed" on April 16, 1862, and celebrating passage of the District of Columbia statehood bill in the House of Representatives.

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

HR 2847

Vote at Home Act of 2025

Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and

HR 2906

SERVICE Act

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

HR 2880

To provide employment protections for, and reinstatement of, certain probationary Federal career employees, and for other purposes.

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Ve